The Shadow
05/09/07, 11:30 am
I suppose we should not even consider these two because the "liberal" media tells us so:
David Broder (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602957.html):
At least six of the eight declared candidates -- Biden, Clinton, Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), former senator John Edwards (N.C.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson -- showed themselves to be both substantive and direct in their responses. The other two, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska), provided a counterpoint of left-wing ideas that drew rebukes for a lack of seriousness from Biden and Obama.
George Stephanopoulos (http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010012?f=h_topic)
Well, but setting aside Mike Gravel -- who provided the comic relief -- everyone else seemed credible, seemed intelligent, seemed like they knew what they were talking about. That has to bring the front-runners down a bit.
Peter Wallsten and Mark Z. Barabak (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-debate27apr27,0,1397304.story?coll=la-home-headlines)
The format for the 90-minute debate allowed each candidate a total of 11 minutes to talk — giving Kucinich and Gravel, both of whom have a negligible showing in polls, equal time with the front-runners
Bob Schieffer (http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_042907.pdf):
But clearly, somebody like senator--former Senator Mike Gravel is
not going to be a serious candidate, and yet he gets equal time, and in the--I
would just say it honestly, in my view, it just wastes time.
Larry King (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0704/26/lkl.01.html) seems to think Kucinich's cause would be helped if he were taller?!?!?
Makes me wonder why we even bother with the process.
David Broder (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602957.html):
At least six of the eight declared candidates -- Biden, Clinton, Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.), former senator John Edwards (N.C.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson -- showed themselves to be both substantive and direct in their responses. The other two, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska), provided a counterpoint of left-wing ideas that drew rebukes for a lack of seriousness from Biden and Obama.
George Stephanopoulos (http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010012?f=h_topic)
Well, but setting aside Mike Gravel -- who provided the comic relief -- everyone else seemed credible, seemed intelligent, seemed like they knew what they were talking about. That has to bring the front-runners down a bit.
Peter Wallsten and Mark Z. Barabak (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-debate27apr27,0,1397304.story?coll=la-home-headlines)
The format for the 90-minute debate allowed each candidate a total of 11 minutes to talk — giving Kucinich and Gravel, both of whom have a negligible showing in polls, equal time with the front-runners
Bob Schieffer (http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/face_042907.pdf):
But clearly, somebody like senator--former Senator Mike Gravel is
not going to be a serious candidate, and yet he gets equal time, and in the--I
would just say it honestly, in my view, it just wastes time.
Larry King (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0704/26/lkl.01.html) seems to think Kucinich's cause would be helped if he were taller?!?!?
Makes me wonder why we even bother with the process.
