Wafflepudding
05/23/07, 07:51 pm
I once heard that spirituality comes from your inner connection between yourself and whatever higher being you worship. This seems to be the... "default" through which most people define the concept.
I feel that this is very narrow and does not fit into many other forms of spiritual development. I'm interested in hearing other people's definition of spirituality. I have my own opinions on the subject, but truth be told it's not something that ranks high on my mental priority list.
For me, spirituality is the way in which we integrate our rational (and irrational) beliefs into the matrix through which we percieve reality. It is not so much truth as it is epistemology, not as much a goal as it is a constant process inherent to humans. I've heard many say that atheists are antispiritual people grounded solely on materialism: Nothing could be further from the truth.
In principle, spirituality transcends rationality. Rationality can be defined as the ideas we have about the world, and about reality while spirituality is the gestalt (or structure if you will) through which those ideas are integrated into our cosmology.
Personally, I do not believe that an omnipotent, omniscient, benevolent entity created the universe(s). That does not make the universe any less special, or devoid my life of meaning. My life is not defined through my relationship with a higher power, or even my place in the universe, I believe universe is chaos, a chaos that tends towards homeostasis, and so my place (or anyone else's) in the greater order of things, if such a thing exists, is dynamic. Change is the universal constant, and so trying to find fixed values or a way to live, like a rock to cling to when the storms come, is a futile excercise.
For me, looking for the eternal, such as heaven, hell, or reincarnation is a way to look for comfort. Life eventually ends, and while I think I don't have an undying soul or will be rewarded or punished for my actions, my actions in the world will determine my legacy, and legacy is what I consider to be immortality. You may pass on, but the impact you made on the world while you were alive will change the world forever in unpredictable ways, as any action, no matter how small, can have unpredictable effects. Which is where karma ties in with the butterfly effect.
I've also heard that atheists worship science. I admit, I am far more impressed with Cherenkov radiation than stattuetes of saints, by particle colliders than cathedrals, by electromagnetic pulses and energy fields than people walking on water or turning it into wine. Does this mean I worship science? no, this means I'm awed by the nature of the universe itself. Science cannot create, it only helps us to gain knowledge and try to control the fundamental forces of the universe. And when I see the process of matter transmutation, whether into energy or other elemental matter, I think it's a thing of great beauty.
Is this making any sense to anyone? :p sort of nerdy?
Jane, Jennifer, I'm looking forward to your four cents on the subject.
I feel that this is very narrow and does not fit into many other forms of spiritual development. I'm interested in hearing other people's definition of spirituality. I have my own opinions on the subject, but truth be told it's not something that ranks high on my mental priority list.
For me, spirituality is the way in which we integrate our rational (and irrational) beliefs into the matrix through which we percieve reality. It is not so much truth as it is epistemology, not as much a goal as it is a constant process inherent to humans. I've heard many say that atheists are antispiritual people grounded solely on materialism: Nothing could be further from the truth.
In principle, spirituality transcends rationality. Rationality can be defined as the ideas we have about the world, and about reality while spirituality is the gestalt (or structure if you will) through which those ideas are integrated into our cosmology.
Personally, I do not believe that an omnipotent, omniscient, benevolent entity created the universe(s). That does not make the universe any less special, or devoid my life of meaning. My life is not defined through my relationship with a higher power, or even my place in the universe, I believe universe is chaos, a chaos that tends towards homeostasis, and so my place (or anyone else's) in the greater order of things, if such a thing exists, is dynamic. Change is the universal constant, and so trying to find fixed values or a way to live, like a rock to cling to when the storms come, is a futile excercise.
For me, looking for the eternal, such as heaven, hell, or reincarnation is a way to look for comfort. Life eventually ends, and while I think I don't have an undying soul or will be rewarded or punished for my actions, my actions in the world will determine my legacy, and legacy is what I consider to be immortality. You may pass on, but the impact you made on the world while you were alive will change the world forever in unpredictable ways, as any action, no matter how small, can have unpredictable effects. Which is where karma ties in with the butterfly effect.
I've also heard that atheists worship science. I admit, I am far more impressed with Cherenkov radiation than stattuetes of saints, by particle colliders than cathedrals, by electromagnetic pulses and energy fields than people walking on water or turning it into wine. Does this mean I worship science? no, this means I'm awed by the nature of the universe itself. Science cannot create, it only helps us to gain knowledge and try to control the fundamental forces of the universe. And when I see the process of matter transmutation, whether into energy or other elemental matter, I think it's a thing of great beauty.
Is this making any sense to anyone? :p sort of nerdy?
Jane, Jennifer, I'm looking forward to your four cents on the subject.
