-V-
12/05/07, 12:42 pm
Michael Moore's SICKO is part horror film, part hope film. I watched it a second time today to take notes and make comments. If you've seen SICKO, this recap will remind you of the parts you shouldn't forget. If you haven't, you probably are sick and too swamped in co-pays and deductibles to afford the $4 rental fee. In that case, you can get the gist of it here in 5 minutes.
The movie starts off showing us a guy sewing up a deep gash in his leg with a needle and thread because he doesn't have insurance, and another guy who'd probably like to give the finger to politicians who allowed health care to become un-affordable in this country, unfortunately half of that finger is missing to an accident because it would cost him $60,000 to have doctors sew it back on (in his case, a needle and thread wouldn't suffice).
But Moore explains that this film is not about them. It is about the pitiful state of Americans that do have health insurance!
The next couple he interviews demonstrate that if you have a serious illness you can have a good job, pay your outrageous monthly insurance premiums, and still end up broke and homeless because of co-pays and deductibles. Several insurance company employees confess regarding a variety of techniques for arbitrarily denying treatment all together, such as, designating one women's prior yeast infection as a disqualifying "pre-existing condition". Adding insult to injury is the bonus incentives for agents who issue the denials.
Moore points out that the decline of health care in America is rooted in 1971 when President Nixon approved a plan for expanding privatization in our health care system. We hear Nixon endorsing "less care and more profit" in a taped meeting with Ehrlichman. The next blow was the health care industry's 100 million dollar campaign to squash First Lady Hillary Clinton's universal health care plan. As the president of the American Medical Association once warned, the risk is that government would "set standards" because god forbid, "the government, wants to treat everyone equal, don't you know". For the next decade Hillary Clinton was reduced to Laura Bush and America's health care rating slipped to a rating of 37th in the World, just ahead of Slovenia. Health company profits soured and their CEO's became billionaires. The final blow was/is the industry buying off old foes and making Hillary Clinton the second leading recipient of their campaign contributions.
Fast forward to Canada where free universal health care helps them live an average of 3 years longer than Americans. And Britain where ALL prescriptions are $10 (HIV treatment, cancer, whatever...). If you're unemployed, you pay $0. A pregnant women gets 6 months off, payed. When Moore visits a hospital each person he asks about "paying", laughs at him. In fact, they have no Billing Department. Moore does, however, find a window under a "cashier" sign but discovers that the cashier pays OUT money to patients who can't afford transportation home.
A former member of Parliament points out that, after the war and a period of massive unemployment, the British figured out that, "if we could have full employment for the purpose of killing Germans" we could make a similar effort towards helping Britons stay alive by building hospitals, recruiting doctors, etc.. The change came when democracy "moved the power from the wallet (of the rich) to the ballot (of every citizen)". In 1948 their government issued the following leaflet that is profound in its simplicity. It should bring a tear to the eye of any American who has ever dared to try to read through their health insurance booklet: Your new health care system will provide you with all medical, dental, and nursing care. Everyone, rich or poor, man, women or child can use it or any part of it. There are no charges, except for a few special items. There are no insurance qualifications. But it is not a charity. You are paying for it mainly as taxpayers. And it will relieve your money worries in times of illness.
How's it working for them? Moore cites a report that "even the poorest people in England with all the environmental factors that give them the worst health in the country, live longer than the wealthiest people in America".
To demonstrate that doctors need not suffer under Britain's National Healthcare System, he interviews one young doctor in his million dollar home in London who earns $200,000 per year with bonus incentives for lowering his patients blood pressure, getting them to quit smoking, etc..
Next stop -- France, where in addition to no billing they also deliver. That's right, doctors make house calls. Day care is $1 an hour. There is no tuition for College. Work weeks are 35 hours. Paid vacations are a minimum of 5 weeks - even for part-timers. If you get married, you get an additional paid week for your honeymoon. You also get a paid day if you need to move. If you have a newborn, the government will send someone to your house to help with laundry, cooking, cleaning, etc..
Impossible you say? One American women now living in France touches upon what I'd say is the key to this movie, this issue, and virtually every issue society faces. She says, "One of the things that keeps everything running here is that, here, the government is afraid of the people, they are afraid of protests, they're afraid of reactions from the people. Whereas in the states, people are afraid of the government, they're afraid of acting up. They're afraid of protesting. They're afraid of getting out. In France that's what people do". (continued...)
The movie starts off showing us a guy sewing up a deep gash in his leg with a needle and thread because he doesn't have insurance, and another guy who'd probably like to give the finger to politicians who allowed health care to become un-affordable in this country, unfortunately half of that finger is missing to an accident because it would cost him $60,000 to have doctors sew it back on (in his case, a needle and thread wouldn't suffice).
But Moore explains that this film is not about them. It is about the pitiful state of Americans that do have health insurance!
The next couple he interviews demonstrate that if you have a serious illness you can have a good job, pay your outrageous monthly insurance premiums, and still end up broke and homeless because of co-pays and deductibles. Several insurance company employees confess regarding a variety of techniques for arbitrarily denying treatment all together, such as, designating one women's prior yeast infection as a disqualifying "pre-existing condition". Adding insult to injury is the bonus incentives for agents who issue the denials.
Moore points out that the decline of health care in America is rooted in 1971 when President Nixon approved a plan for expanding privatization in our health care system. We hear Nixon endorsing "less care and more profit" in a taped meeting with Ehrlichman. The next blow was the health care industry's 100 million dollar campaign to squash First Lady Hillary Clinton's universal health care plan. As the president of the American Medical Association once warned, the risk is that government would "set standards" because god forbid, "the government, wants to treat everyone equal, don't you know". For the next decade Hillary Clinton was reduced to Laura Bush and America's health care rating slipped to a rating of 37th in the World, just ahead of Slovenia. Health company profits soured and their CEO's became billionaires. The final blow was/is the industry buying off old foes and making Hillary Clinton the second leading recipient of their campaign contributions.
Fast forward to Canada where free universal health care helps them live an average of 3 years longer than Americans. And Britain where ALL prescriptions are $10 (HIV treatment, cancer, whatever...). If you're unemployed, you pay $0. A pregnant women gets 6 months off, payed. When Moore visits a hospital each person he asks about "paying", laughs at him. In fact, they have no Billing Department. Moore does, however, find a window under a "cashier" sign but discovers that the cashier pays OUT money to patients who can't afford transportation home.
A former member of Parliament points out that, after the war and a period of massive unemployment, the British figured out that, "if we could have full employment for the purpose of killing Germans" we could make a similar effort towards helping Britons stay alive by building hospitals, recruiting doctors, etc.. The change came when democracy "moved the power from the wallet (of the rich) to the ballot (of every citizen)". In 1948 their government issued the following leaflet that is profound in its simplicity. It should bring a tear to the eye of any American who has ever dared to try to read through their health insurance booklet: Your new health care system will provide you with all medical, dental, and nursing care. Everyone, rich or poor, man, women or child can use it or any part of it. There are no charges, except for a few special items. There are no insurance qualifications. But it is not a charity. You are paying for it mainly as taxpayers. And it will relieve your money worries in times of illness.
How's it working for them? Moore cites a report that "even the poorest people in England with all the environmental factors that give them the worst health in the country, live longer than the wealthiest people in America".
To demonstrate that doctors need not suffer under Britain's National Healthcare System, he interviews one young doctor in his million dollar home in London who earns $200,000 per year with bonus incentives for lowering his patients blood pressure, getting them to quit smoking, etc..
Next stop -- France, where in addition to no billing they also deliver. That's right, doctors make house calls. Day care is $1 an hour. There is no tuition for College. Work weeks are 35 hours. Paid vacations are a minimum of 5 weeks - even for part-timers. If you get married, you get an additional paid week for your honeymoon. You also get a paid day if you need to move. If you have a newborn, the government will send someone to your house to help with laundry, cooking, cleaning, etc..
Impossible you say? One American women now living in France touches upon what I'd say is the key to this movie, this issue, and virtually every issue society faces. She says, "One of the things that keeps everything running here is that, here, the government is afraid of the people, they are afraid of protests, they're afraid of reactions from the people. Whereas in the states, people are afraid of the government, they're afraid of acting up. They're afraid of protesting. They're afraid of getting out. In France that's what people do". (continued...)
