PDA

Liberal Democrats Unite!

You've visited the ProgressivesOnline.com archive.
View our full featured site -> : Off Topic Posts


sweetpea
03/08/06, 07:28 am
Pea: You make some reasonable points in the debate...

but then you lose me (and most others that understand & value what is special about America) when you:

- speak repeatedly of it being wrong to "bad-mouth" America (as if, of all people, Americans must stay silent in the face of their government's misdeeds ... and as though you & yours stayed silent & respectful during the Clinton years)
---Did you read what AL Gore said in S.A.? I would recommend you do. Do you recognize the setting. He is in a country taht doesn't allow women to drive while preaching about how we are routinely and indiscrimnately rounding up Muslims and holding them prisoner. He lied. He lied with no evidence. And he did it for the money. If you cannot recognize the difference then shame on you.


- persist in the desperate, convenient and outrageous lie, in the face of all we now know, that "Iraq was a threat to this country".
---Did you read my quotes from Hillary, Madeline, John Kerry, Bill, Hans Blix, et. al.? Did you? They said the EXACT same thing.

In this latter case, you're simply playing word-games (like debating what the meaning of the word "is" is).
---No. In this case. (This thread) I am treating -V- to some of the same presumptuous, condescending, berating, strawman laden posts that he opened with.

A weak case can be made that any nation is vaguely "a threat" and may harbor terrorists, but the
- unjustified mass murder of so many tens of thousands of virtually defenseless civilians
- wreckless incompetence in the handling of the war
- enormous waste in terms of American lives and treasure
whether based on erroneous info or lies is something no person of conscience can rationalize and should make every otherwise proud American shameful of their government and angry.
-This type of diatribe is why folks of your persuasion (far left) are out of power and will stay that way. Keep saying it. Keep letting MoveOn adn George Soros dictate Democrat talking points and keep on losing elections.

It is your "moral dodge" on this issue, your failure to hold the administration accountable and your comfort level with abusive power that casts a dark shadow on all of your other arguments.
-- I didn't dodge a thing. I ansered specific adn general questions. -V-, however, and I suspect you can't or won't.

An then..... one as well-read as you.... asks for examples of "corruption and lies" with respect to the current administration, thereby taking yourself completely and irretrievably out of the debate.
--If it so obvious then point one out.

Still, I salute you for coming somewhere in the vicinity, Pea, of intellectual honesty and meaningful communication. Rare, thus far, for conservatives in this venue.
--Thanks. You should try it. Try the Free Republic. It's pretty good.

sweetpea
03/08/06, 08:49 am
Amidst all the huffing and puffing i believe there is the closest thing to an answer as we're going to get from you.
I'm th eone huffing and puffing? Really? You strat this thread in the manner in which it was started and try to tell me I'm huffing and puffing? Wha t kind of twilight zone you living in?


You would answer the survey YES to the Presidents approval rating, and the reason is because "national security is the President's first and foremost job and you believe GWB has done a good job"
--Here here for some compreshension skills.


I thought it would be redundant this late in the game to rehash the "lies and corruption" considering there are about 100 pages of specifics on that already on this site. Perhaps we should put together a concise list for future reference. Many of them, btw, are related to national security, which is the reason you say you support this president (despite you're opposing his port sellout).
--HAve at it. IF you are interested in a debate then I suggest you get specific. General statemetns that Bush lied or Bush is a facist just won't get it.

For the purpose of this thread, it may suffice that, exhibit B, sweetpea, claims to have renewed his Bushivic membership because Georgey Jr. picked up a megaphone one day and promised he was going to protect him from the Boogeymen.
--For the purpose of this thread let's suffice it to say that -V- doens't like it when others make generalized, presumptive posts about him. But doesn't mind starting a thread doing just that. Futher, let's suffice it to say that he hates GWB so much so that he cannot see straight. Further, let's suffice it to say -V- doesn't have any suggestions on what the US should do about terrorism, just criticisms fo the people fighting the good fight.

As to the profile of today's Bush supporter I'll just chalk up one to:

Motivated by Fear, Terror/Terrorism, Evil, Boogeymen
(though none of us can define those terms)
--As to the profile of -V- I'll jsut chalk it up to can dih it / but cannot take it. Motivated by hatred of a temporary office holder. Politically vested in failure of his own country. Speaks in general terms of corruption and lies, but cannot seem to give one single example; yet when numerous examples of liberal hypocrisy, law breaking adn lies are given convenienly ignores them.

My prescription for you (the cure, if you will) is, next time, rather than vote for a pig like Bush, just sleep with your automatic weapon under your pillow and, though I'm sure they don't live in your neighborhood, just walk around Arabs, Gays, Blacks, the French, and Athiests if you should pass them in the street.
--My prescription for you is to stop making yourself look foolish by lumping ARabs, gays, blacks,frencha dn atheists into one large bucket of people you presume I hate. Do you have one tiny little piece of evidence that I am some kind of bigot? ONe? Do you have anything, besides your own prejudice? Do you dare answer this question?

ILoveBush, you're up next. Let's see if I can help with your abusive addiction.
--I beleive it is stil your turn -V-. You seem to have a lot of prejudices that you need to work out. Let's see if we can rid you of your habits of ad hominem attacks, personal attacks, innuendo laden posts with no specifics, gross generalizations about others who are different politically than you, and thin skin.

-V-
03/08/06, 02:15 pm
Posts that veer too far off topic after moderator warnings will be banished here rather than disrupting the flow of the original thread. But it's not like Bogeyland or being sent to the Cornfield. You can pick up the conversation here if you like.

JamesP
03/09/06, 01:02 am
Quoting Pea:
"---Did you read my quotes from Hillary, Madeline, John Kerry, Bill, Hans Blix, et. al.? Did you? They said the EXACT same thing."


Only have time for 1 tonight - will get to the others later:

All are accountable for their errors or misrepresentations. All.

But the President is the most accountable.

He led. He acted. He, more than anyone else, is responsible for this war.

He intentionally (many of us believe because there is a great deal of evidence) used the power and megaphone of his office to mislead us by cherry-picking and amplifying only selected intelligence.

He abused our trust and no longer deserves it.

He lied or he was dead wrong
and now so many others are dead as a result
and the buck stops at his desk.

Your refusal to hold him accountable is inexplicable -
You're supposed to believe in "accountability".

Your attempt to point at others like a schoolboy and lamely repeat "they did it too" is "school-boyish" and beneath your intelligence and ours.

Your credibility is down again. You are either a liar or a blind partisan.

Disappointing.

And the people you quote as "saying the exact same thing" said many things on this subject, at many times, for different reason (politics, bluster, tactics). But they didn't take us to war. Bush did.

The selective quoting is, sorry but I have to say it again - "Limbaugh-esque".
Like him, you understand context and big picture - you just pretend not to - in order to make false arguments - in order to lie - manipulate - like the President that you profess not to fully support - but then strain logic and credibility in the attempt.

Pea - Pea - I had such high hopes for thee.....

Mr. Magoo
03/09/06, 07:33 am
Jamesp says:
"The selective quoting is, sorry but I have to say it again - "Limbaugh-esque".
Like him, you understand context and big picture - you just pretend not to - in order to make false arguments - in order to lie - manipulate - like the President that you profess not to fully support - but then strain logic and credibility in the attempt."

Man, if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black... Taking things out of context,lying,false arguments,manipulate...You could just as well be talking about..Hilary,Kerry,Kennedy,Bill Mahr,Michael Moore,The NY Times,Time magazine etc.etc.

sweetpea
03/13/06, 08:32 pm
Quoting Pea:
"---Did you read my quotes from Hillary, Madeline, John Kerry, Bill, Hans Blix, et. al.? Did you? They said the EXACT same thing."


Only have time for 1 tonight - will get to the others later:

All are accountable for their errors or misrepresentations. All.

But the President is the most accountable.

He led. He acted. He, more than anyone else, is responsible for this war.

He intentionally (many of us believe because there is a great deal of evidence) used the power and megaphone of his office to mislead us by cherry-picking and amplifying only selected intelligence.

He abused our trust and no longer deserves it.

He lied or he was dead wrong
and now so many others are dead as a result
and the buck stops at his desk.

Your refusal to hold him accountable is inexplicable -
You're supposed to believe in "accountability".

Your attempt to point at others like a schoolboy and lamely repeat "they did it too" is "school-boyish" and beneath your intelligence and ours.

Your credibility is down again. You are either a liar or a blind partisan.

Disappointing.

And the people you quote as "saying the exact same thing" said many things on this subject, at many times, for different reason (politics, bluster, tactics). But they didn't take us to war. Bush did.

The selective quoting is, sorry but I have to say it again - "Limbaugh-esque".
Like him, you understand context and big picture - you just pretend not to - in order to make false arguments - in order to lie - manipulate - like the President that you profess not to fully support - but then strain logic and credibility in the attempt.

Pea - Pea - I had such high hopes for thee.....

Bush acted and everyone else postured and talked. Everyone beleived what they were saying or everyone was lying. If everyone was lying then so be it. ...then criticize everyone. But, it everyone believed then the question begs why did so many Dems/libs just talk and not act.

Why don't you expalin the context I missed or ignored. I can't wait to read this. Does it mean all htose folks just said those things, but didn't mean them? Please explain.